Should the Bible say “Lucifer” or “morning star” in Isaiah 14:12? Does it refer to Satan?
The King James Bible is correct. Although “Lucifer” is the Latin version of the name, the passage is talking about Satan, not a mere Babylonian king. “King James Bible Companion” David W Daniels, Author
January 28 2012 01:29 am | Religion & Spirituality
Psalm9422 on 28 Jan 2012 at 5:19 am #
I love your insight and commentary. You often clear up something that previously had been confusing for me.
God Bless you brother.
neekothesecond on 28 Jan 2012 at 5:25 am #
Is this a trick question?
It should say what is already written…. “O Lucifer, son of the morning!
Jesus was peaking in past tense as to tell him what he has lost and is lost and fallen.
Revelation 22:16
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
Jesus is the Morning star.
Read KJV only. In this passage alone in the NIV causes confusion.
dreamwarrior2008 on 28 Jan 2012 at 5:32 am #
Thank you so much for posting this video.
resurrectionway on 28 Jan 2012 at 6:10 am #
the book of Revelation is a book of future events Rev. 12 has not happen yet.
the bible says and the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan. if this was an event that took place already then it would be the cherub that is being cast out and not a dragon. Christ saw the devil not the cherub. the devil was created not some one that was good and later became evil.
resurrectionway on 28 Jan 2012 at 6:31 am #
Adam was created he was not born, God created him perfect and sinless until the day he sin. he is the only human that was not born and Evil wasn’t ether. Adam was in the Garden and may be he was the anointed cherub. the word cherub in this verse God could be using it to describe Adam.