RUCKMAN: IMPORTANCE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE – #1

random331 asked:


Higher Quality: www.youtube.com This clip is taken from one of Dr. Ruckman’s presentations to a meeting at Lestor Roloff’s church regarding the King James Bible.

DividingWord.com

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
RUCKMAN: IMPORTANCE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE - #1, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

August 26 2009 04:39 am | Nonprofit

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

25 Responses to “RUCKMAN: IMPORTANCE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE – #1”

  1. RyuXHalo on 27 Aug 2009 at 4:48 am #

    DividingWord Fan.com

    I suppose you know this because you’ve seen the original parchments? Don’t try to sound smart. And they already have constructed an perfect version in the english language, it’s called the King James Version.
    Psalms 12:7: Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. stonerolledaway on 29 Aug 2009 at 4:56 am #

    DividingWord.com

    the only thing that was not corrupt was the original parchments of the books of the bible. Errors began to filter in immediately as copies were made. Even so, our 5600 copies are so close and the discrepencies are not in critical doctine parts. If you want to try to construct a perfect english version, good luck. I dont see the basis nor the need and still cant figure out why this is an issue. I suspect pride in language and possibly laziness in study.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. jakedevon on 01 Sep 2009 at 9:10 am #

    DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts

    ‘Paul, Matthew, Luke, Moses didn’t talk like that.’

    One person in the Bible did talk like that. The devil in the garden of Eden.
    The devil is the first Bible correcter.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. RyuXHalo on 02 Sep 2009 at 11:49 am #

    http://www.DividingWord.com

    Because it is not from corrupted manuscripts such as Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. stonerolledaway on 04 Sep 2009 at 8:50 am #

    DividingWord.com

    and your basis for this is??…..

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. RyuXHalo on 06 Sep 2009 at 9:25 pm #

    http://www.DividingWord.com

    Very much so.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. BibleBelieverAV1611 on 08 Sep 2009 at 10:41 pm #

    http://www.DividingWord.com

    Dr. Ruckman is brilliant! God has used him mightly!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. joewar420 on 10 Sep 2009 at 12:40 pm #

    DividingWord.com

    “SEEK YE FIRST THE KINGDOM OF GOD, AND THE REST SHALL BE ADDED UP TO YOU”. They look for contraversy, they look for freedom, they look for fights, they don’t look for God, and they will not find him.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. joewar420 on 11 Sep 2009 at 8:34 am #

    DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts

    Has anybody noticed that non believers tend to decide what they want God to be, instead of following God they want God to follow them. Its a sinners dream come true, They have no remorse because they feel they don’t sin because God is what they want. Hypacritical right. It also sounds alot like Alister Crowly preaching “DO WHAT THY WILL”.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. Christians4Christ on 11 Sep 2009 at 10:10 pm #

    DividingWord Fan.com

    The reason why I (personally) do not like the other translations (i.e., NIV, NLT, NKJV,…..) of The Bible is because it is not necessary, wherefore since The Trinity lives within His “true remnants” & is the author(s) of the word(s) within The Bible, The Gods will teach you all things.

    John 14:26 (KJV)
    But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. stonerolledaway on 12 Sep 2009 at 1:50 am #

    DividingWord.com

    you guys are amazing, still not one shread of evidence supporting your claim. i guess the lost tribes all went to britain, right?

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  12. random331 on 12 Sep 2009 at 7:46 pm #

    DividingWord.com

    As long as you never say “scripture” or “words of God” or “Holy Bible” (since the originals are all missing, and no God-breathed Koine-English dictionary exists for you) at least you aren’t being a hypocrite. However you are calling God a liar since he promised to preserve his words.

    You agnostics can sit around in your blind ignorance and wonder what God might have said, but us Bible-believers have the actual preserved and translated scriptures in English: the AV 1611.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  13. stonerolledaway on 13 Sep 2009 at 12:07 am #

    Dividing Word….

    as far as I can tell, the time of god breathed scripture writing ended with john’s pen in 96 ad with revelation and the warning not take away or add anything to this word. claiming god breathed inspiration 1500 years later is dangerous ground indeed.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. stonerolledaway on 14 Sep 2009 at 3:50 pm #

    http://www.DividingWord.com

    is the king james bible more reliable than our 5600 copies in greek of the new testament that match 99.5%??

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  15. xcookiemonster88 on 15 Sep 2009 at 5:25 pm #

    DividingWord Fan.com

    The whole protestant movement was anti Semitic.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  16. HeresyDetector on 19 Sep 2009 at 2:41 am #

    DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts

    I am not nit picking the translators. I am a calvinist, and yet all of the King James Only advocates, who will not even consider looking at another translation, all are Arminian in their theolgy.. They trust the men who originally translated the King James, but they reject these men’s theology. Hyppocracy.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  17. KingJamesBible on 20 Sep 2009 at 7:05 am #

    DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts

    It’s even MORE amazing how God ORIGINALLY gave the writing of the ORIGINAL autographs to MURDERS

    i.e. moses, David

    and yet YOU would NIT PICK a translator, as if GOD could NOT overlook this??

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  18. HeresyDetector on 23 Sep 2009 at 1:26 pm #

    DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts

    This is a very Christ like comment.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  19. HeresyDetector on 25 Sep 2009 at 2:24 am #

    DividingWord.com

    I love the fact that ALL the advocates of King James Onlyism deny the fact that nearly ALL, if not all the translators of the King James Bible were Calvinistic in their theology. Its hilarious to me to give total trust to these men in their translation, yet none in their theology.. The hyppocracy is mind boggling!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  20. outlawislamnow on 25 Sep 2009 at 9:40 pm #

    DividingWord.com

    Yes, as a matter of fact “it” was a proper translation.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  21. random331 on 27 Sep 2009 at 3:43 am #

    http://www.DividingWord.com

    Wrong. There was no B.C. Septuagint, that’s an old hoax. We had the Bible from the Jewish Apostles (Romans 3:2) not Romanites.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  22. wjm7259 on 27 Sep 2009 at 9:39 pm #

    DividingWord Fan.com

    the septuagint is the true bible. it is the one used by jesus& theapostles not the kjv or any other english bible. All Baptists have a bible because of the Catholic Church , not because of an english king or his translators & that includes erasmus the catholic priest who was so instrumental in producing the TR

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  23. TheDoctor394 on 27 Sep 2009 at 10:02 pm #

    KING JAMES Bible

    Paul was writing about something 1600 years before it existed?

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  24. KJBman777 on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 am #

    DividingWord.com

    Psylliumhead, your name is “strawman”. Go to 1 John 5:6, then go to John 14:17 and actually MEDITATE on them – perhaps God will have mercy on you and give you understanding.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  25. random331 on 02 Oct 2009 at 4:57 am #

    DividingWord.com

    Just because you are too stupid to understand something doesn’t mean the Bible is wrong.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply