Name one. I would wager a guess that 99% of the people that try to pick a fight against the word of God, have never read it through. Most gain some thread of a controversial statement from a Dan Brown tyoe book or another anti-God blog somewhere. I defy to name 1 contradiction.

“have never read it through.”
That’s certainly not my case.

“I defy to name 1 contradiction.”
Oho! “Defy”, no less!
Here are three for you:

Did Jesus **** on a sponge while being crucified?

Which of seven choices were Jesus’ last words?

Who visited the tomb Easter morning?

“The KJV is the truth!”

Right.
Actually, the bible is so vague, so large,
and so filled with inconsistencies
that you can ALWAYS make it say whatever you like.
That’s why even though Jesus himself
prayed that his followers would be ‘one’,
there are now nearly 40,000 official denominations (divisions)
of christianity, each of which is convinced
that all the others are wrong
and that they alone have the Truth.
And I dare say most of them are KJV fans.

Most of them are not not KJV fans!
Show me a tv preacher or radio preacher or author who is KJV-only.
Most KJV preachers are considered heiritcs by the apostate laodicean compromisers of our day.
And Paul’s command for Christians is to rightly divide the word of truth. 2 Timothy 2:15. If every Christian did that there wouldn’t be 40,000 different denominations.

I’ll answer all three when you describe why any of these are a contradiction. If you’re referring to the fcact that the gospels are somewhat different from each other, it is becasue they are from 4 different ponts of view.
You are wanting to argue semantics to prove that God doesn’t exist.
You use the same tired arguments that other atheists use. You’re trying to disprove faith with science. Satan has blinded you, like he did Paul. I pray that the Lord will save you.
Eph. 6:10-11

“I’ll answer all three when you describe why any of these are a contradiction.”
Well, I wasn’t expecting a real answer,
so I’m neither surprised nor disappointed.

“4 different ponts of view.”
Yet all inspired by god, perfect and inerrant.
Can you not see that this is irrational?

“You are wanting to argue semantics”
Not at all.
A direct conflict between two statements is NOT “semantics”,
no matter how much you would like that to be the case.

Was that before or after they slaughtered each other?

You have a funny idea about what a revival is.

You obviously don’t read the Old Testament.

You obviously think that anyone reading your post has any idea what you’re talking about when you refer to the “East Africa revival”.

I’ve read the Old Testament more times than you could count… since you obviously suffer from some sort of learning and communication disability.

Do you think it’s very Christlike to insult a person by saying they have a learning disability?

Go and read about he East Africa revival and see how God swept thousands into the kingdom without the KJV.

The fact that a people can experience a revival and a later generation turn their back on God is attested in the Old Testament.