31825 Responseshttp%3A%2F%2FDividingWord.com%2F2009%2F08%2F23%2Fthe-king-james-bible-song%2FThe+King+James+Bible+Song2009-08-23+23%3A55%3A23Vincehttp%3A%2F%2FDividingWord.com%2F2009%2F08%2F23%2Fthe-king-james-bible-song%2F to “The King James Bible Song”
they Had about 5000 manuscripts the Textus receptus they had other Bibles from that text not the quality as the King James the Great Bible many times only had one tied to the Pulpit common People did not have a Bible so King James gathered 54 on a translation committee and with the Lords Help produced the KJV with 7 updates of spelling of words and God Preserved the KJV and has keep it without error God is Good!! Just a Thought?
So you say. But, I am pointing out that the KJV 1st. Ed CONTAINED THOSE BOOKS (and a couple of others). So, forget the spelling error issue, purple elephants, other non-sequitors and answer me this:
If the KJV 1st Ed. English translation is the perfect and preserved Word as you claim, then why aren’t you reading it? If it was perfect then it should be good enough for you and anyone else!
Yes it’s a “strawman”. Unfortunately my words aren’t infallible
I don’t have to answer your original question, because I’m questioning your definition of an “error”. That’s like asking me, “Why are elephants purple?” then demanding I respond. Sorry, no can do.
As for the the Apocrypha, it was placed in the MIDDLE for historic reasons, it was never accepted as part of the canon by the translators. Even the Jewish scholars didn’t accept it.
You still havn’t answered my original question. The 1st Ed. contained 80 books. Does your version have the same number? If not then the 1st Ed. wasn’t perfect was it? If so, then what version are you reading?
P.s. It’s a strawman argument.
spelling errors are only presentational errors. If I give you a perfect bible with a tear in a page suddenly it’s not perfect?
So now you use the scarecrow argument, calling us cultists. You might want to learn what defines a cult before you start throwing around accusations.
Ironically, you have just made my point. If it was the only perfect and preserved English translation it would have been perfect from the beginning. There would not have been any errors – spelling or otherwise. The 1st Ed. would have been it. It wasn’t — sounds like a cult to me.
matt 26:36 says Jesus in the first printing, you are referring to the second printing. nice try.
as for the other editions, it was needed to correct spelling errors (which are only presentational errors, not true errors in the Bible) and why are you using an ‘l’ instead of a “j”? I think you are confusing the symbol that used to be used for the letter ‘s’. Yes it was perfect, it was being purified from the 6 preceding english Bibles (Psalm 12:6-7: “…purified seven times”
Enough! Consider this. If the KJV is the preserved , perfect, and only translation for the English speaking world, then it should have been perfect from the get go.
In the KJV 1611 Ver: Matthew 26:36 reads Iudas instead of Iesus (in the Garden of Gethsemane). Whoops!
In the KJV 1631 Ver: Exodus 20:14 reads Thou shalt commit adultery
In the 1653 KJV Ver: 1 Corinthians 6:9 reads Know ye not that the unrighteous shall inherit the kingdom of God?
Oh. And your historical sources for that statement are? Just because some espouse a position doesn’t make it fact. This is nothing more than pseudo-intellectual pabulum!
pseudorandom331–the KJV is God’s word for the english speaking people. other languages have their versions based on the proper manuscripts. like dreamer said–dont worry about them, worry bout your soul
A Great Song! with a powerful message! Thank God for anyone who now a days that takes a stand or Gods preserved word for the English speaking People.{done in a cute way}
The Bible says the earth is flat.
And that the sun revolves around the earth.
And that humans are made of dirt.
And that snakes, donkeys, and bushes talk.
And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.
And you’re worried about which VERSION to trust??
Wow.
Must not bother you to lie and blaspheme the Word of God…ignorant one, I doubt you actually own or read a genuine 1611 KJV. He scholar did Jesus and Paul read the KJV?
Amen. Anyone who thinks it doesn’t matter which translation to read should to a comparative study on Zechariah 13:6 between the different translations. That is really “eye opening.”
I also know that the NIV left out whole passages in II Kings, and that I quit reading “The Message” because of all the curse words.
Some think this song is funny, but I disagree. It is one of the saddest songs in the entire world. Only the death of Jesus on the Cross could be more sad. It is far too true to be funny. God has allowed Satan to flod this sinful world that hates God’s Light with false testimonies of the gospel and everything about the eternal Truth of God. It is man’s shame, not the Lord’s. It is because of the love of pleasures and the hatred of God that this is happening. God is NOT mocked.
winkifuluvgod on 26 Aug 2009 at 6:48 pm #
DividingWord Fan.com
……………
herd0ne on 29 Aug 2009 at 7:08 pm #
Dividing Word….
Great Song..
I loved it…
bopritchard on 30 Aug 2009 at 9:48 am #
DividingWord.com
That was great. You KJV onlyers provide so much entertainment. Many thanks.
dreamer4everqt on 02 Sep 2009 at 12:54 pm #
DividingWord.com
they Had about 5000 manuscripts the Textus receptus they had other Bibles from that text not the quality as the King James the Great Bible many times only had one tied to the Pulpit common People did not have a Bible so King James gathered 54 on a translation committee and with the Lords Help produced the KJV with 7 updates of spelling of words and God Preserved the KJV and has keep it without error God is Good!! Just a Thought?
pseudorandom331 on 03 Sep 2009 at 8:10 am #
KING JAMES Bible
So you say. But, I am pointing out that the KJV 1st. Ed CONTAINED THOSE BOOKS (and a couple of others). So, forget the spelling error issue, purple elephants, other non-sequitors and answer me this:
If the KJV 1st Ed. English translation is the perfect and preserved Word as you claim, then why aren’t you reading it? If it was perfect then it should be good enough for you and anyone else!
talkingfortruth on 05 Sep 2009 at 8:38 pm #
DividingWord.com
Yes it’s a “strawman”. Unfortunately my words aren’t infallible
I don’t have to answer your original question, because I’m questioning your definition of an “error”. That’s like asking me, “Why are elephants purple?” then demanding I respond. Sorry, no can do.
As for the the Apocrypha, it was placed in the MIDDLE for historic reasons, it was never accepted as part of the canon by the translators. Even the Jewish scholars didn’t accept it.
pseudorandom331 on 06 Sep 2009 at 9:08 am #
DividingWord.com
You still havn’t answered my original question. The 1st Ed. contained 80 books. Does your version have the same number? If not then the 1st Ed. wasn’t perfect was it? If so, then what version are you reading?
P.s. It’s a strawman argument.
talkingfortruth on 08 Sep 2009 at 9:41 am #
DividingWord Fan.com
spelling errors are only presentational errors. If I give you a perfect bible with a tear in a page suddenly it’s not perfect?
So now you use the scarecrow argument, calling us cultists. You might want to learn what defines a cult before you start throwing around accusations.
pseudorandom331 on 11 Sep 2009 at 10:35 am #
DividingWord.com
Ironically, you have just made my point. If it was the only perfect and preserved English translation it would have been perfect from the beginning. There would not have been any errors – spelling or otherwise. The 1st Ed. would have been it. It wasn’t — sounds like a cult to me.
talkingfortruth on 14 Sep 2009 at 4:49 am #
DividingWord.com For Dividing Word Enthusiasts
matt 26:36 says Jesus in the first printing, you are referring to the second printing. nice try.
as for the other editions, it was needed to correct spelling errors (which are only presentational errors, not true errors in the Bible) and why are you using an ‘l’ instead of a “j”? I think you are confusing the symbol that used to be used for the letter ‘s’. Yes it was perfect, it was being purified from the 6 preceding english Bibles (Psalm 12:6-7: “…purified seven times”
pseudorandom331 on 15 Sep 2009 at 10:05 am #
DividingWord.com
Enough! Consider this. If the KJV is the preserved , perfect, and only translation for the English speaking world, then it should have been perfect from the get go.
In the KJV 1611 Ver: Matthew 26:36 reads Iudas instead of Iesus (in the Garden of Gethsemane). Whoops!
In the KJV 1631 Ver: Exodus 20:14 reads Thou shalt commit adultery
In the 1653 KJV Ver: 1 Corinthians 6:9 reads Know ye not that the unrighteous shall inherit the kingdom of God?
Shall I go on?
pseudorandom331 on 16 Sep 2009 at 10:17 am #
DividingWord.com
I would like to know what edition of the KJV this guy reads and considers to be the perfect word of God.
pseudorandom331 on 19 Sep 2009 at 5:41 pm #
DividingWord.com
Oh. And your historical sources for that statement are? Just because some espouse a position doesn’t make it fact. This is nothing more than pseudo-intellectual pabulum!
filoIII on 20 Sep 2009 at 6:41 am #
DividingWord.com
pseudorandom331–the KJV is God’s word for the english speaking people. other languages have their versions based on the proper manuscripts. like dreamer said–dont worry about them, worry bout your soul
pseudorandom331 on 23 Sep 2009 at 5:27 pm #
Dividing Word….
Here’s a thought… How about answering my question?
dreamer4everqt on 23 Sep 2009 at 7:16 pm #
KING JAMES Bible
I think this is a great video! I am all for you!
dreamer4everqt on 26 Sep 2009 at 11:10 am #
DividingWord.com
A Great Song! with a powerful message! Thank God for anyone who now a days that takes a stand or Gods preserved word for the English speaking People.{done in a cute way}
dreamer4everqt on 29 Sep 2009 at 9:09 am #
DividingWord.com
don’t worry about then be concerned about now? just a thought
Imaginefree69 on 30 Sep 2009 at 8:06 pm #
DividingWord.com
The Bible says the earth is flat.
And that the sun revolves around the earth.
And that humans are made of dirt.
And that snakes, donkeys, and bushes talk.
And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.
And you’re worried about which VERSION to trust??
Wow.
tntpierce on 02 Oct 2009 at 1:55 pm #
http://www.DividingWord.com
Must not bother you to lie and blaspheme the Word of God…ignorant one, I doubt you actually own or read a genuine 1611 KJV. He scholar did Jesus and Paul read the KJV?
awannabewriter on 03 Oct 2009 at 5:53 am #
DividingWord Fan.com
Amen. Anyone who thinks it doesn’t matter which translation to read should to a comparative study on Zechariah 13:6 between the different translations. That is really “eye opening.”
I also know that the NIV left out whole passages in II Kings, and that I quit reading “The Message” because of all the curse words.
brandongott on 04 Oct 2009 at 2:41 pm #
DividingWord.com
So sad! So ignorant!
pseudorandom331 on 05 Oct 2009 at 10:32 pm #
DividingWord.com
What did Christians read from 33AD to 1611AD? LOL…
SisterSunnshine on 08 Oct 2009 at 4:03 am #
DividingWord Fan.com
I like this song!!!
offline111 on 11 Oct 2009 at 3:33 am #
DividingWord.com
Some think this song is funny, but I disagree. It is one of the saddest songs in the entire world. Only the death of Jesus on the Cross could be more sad. It is far too true to be funny. God has allowed Satan to flod this sinful world that hates God’s Light with false testimonies of the gospel and everything about the eternal Truth of God. It is man’s shame, not the Lord’s. It is because of the love of pleasures and the hatred of God that this is happening. God is NOT mocked.